Showing posts with label Amy Adams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amy Adams. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 September 2015

The Master (2012) Movie Review


Director: Paul Thomas Anderson
Writer: Paul Thomas Anderson
Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams

It is not often that a film can keep my absolute attention for a runtime of over two hours. The Master is a film that constantly keeps your intrigue and very much requires your concentration. It’s not a particularly confusing film (although it’s not exactly straightforward either) but the characters and the relationships between them are so incredibly complex and deep that it would be an impressive feat to even try to take this film lightly. This makes the film an extremely powerful one.

Joaquin Phoenix is an alcoholic, sex-focussed World War II veteran trying to adjust himself into regular life. In doing this he stows away on a yacht thinking that he could get a job putting his experience as a seaman to good use. By pure coincidence, he finds a man who claims to be able to heal him. Both intrigue and a spiral into insanity ensue.

Definitively the best aspect of this movie is the two lead performances from Phoenix and Phillip Seymour Hoffman. Both characters are equally eccentric Freddie Quell (Phoenix) is like a drunken aggressive Forrest Gump and Lancaster Dodd (Hoffman) is eerily manipulative, tricking people into believing his fabricated superiority. While each character is good in their own right, the way in which they affect each other is fantastic. The scenes focussed on these two characters in particular are by far the best in the film. The first scene that shows Dodd’s ‘processing’ methods is a totally captivating one as Dodd absolutely tears through Quell’s past, travelling directly through the event horizon of emotion with huge power. Honestly, the scene is so good that I would recommend for no reason other than watching it.

That is not to say that it is the film’s only merit. The film is an aesthetically brilliant one. Not only are all the shots especially well composed (not to mention the complexity of some of the longer shots in the film. The camera movements take up the entirety of the room they are shooting in, moving around pillars while capturing some very well directed and memorable action) but the film also utilises a variety of lighting choices. Most of the film is brightly lit; most of the walls in the any scene are a brilliant white, somewhat reflecting how highly Dodd’s followers see him (the light scenes almost all have large amounts of people and the darker ones are between no more than three).

One very interesting point about this movie is how someone may interpret its standpoint. There are enough characters with differing opinions of Dodd’s methods to give you an entire banquet for thought. At no point is Dodd entirely ousted as a charlatan nor does he ever admit it. It is hinted at but is not a certainty. This uncertainty means that it can be taken in a huge amount of ways.  There are parts of the film that seem in favour of the power of alternative therapy and some that seem against it. Because of this, the film can be interpreted in hugely different ways depending on the viewer.

The Master is an incredibly tense and thought-provoking film about an eerily magnetic man who declares the healing powers of his methods. Two massively complex central performances shoot this film into greatness. It is powerful, endlessly engaging and also inhabits the entire spectrum of emotions.


The Master receives a: 9/10

Monday, 24 November 2014

Man Of Steel (2013) Movie Review



Director: Zack Snyder
Writers: David S. Goyer, Christopher Nolan
Starring: Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Michael Shannon

When I first saw the trailer for Man of Steel, I was excited to see another DC movie with Christopher Nolan working on it after the Dark Knight. A lot of people really enjoyed the movie many hated it. While it isn’t the worst movie I have ever seen, I heavily disliked it.

One issue the movie has is

that it’s apparent that DC only wants to reboot Superman because of the success that Marvel has had with their cinematic universe. I didn’t see the need for another Superman lineage at the moment since the character is pretty much the least interesting thing that has ever existed. By the end of the movie, that opinion wasn’t changed at all.

The first half of the movie had some enjoyable scenes. For instance, the one where he crucifies a truck was moderately funny. The problem here is that many of the scenes were unnecessary. In one bewilderingly short scene, Kal-el saves some people from a burning… oil rig. You could say that this was showing the audience what he is capable of but he doesn’t really do much. He basically grabs onto a massive pole and doesn’t catch on fire. Scenes like this are peppered about the movie. Laurence Fishburne’s boring version of J. Jonah Jameson is in about two scenes and contributes far less than Laurence Fishburne should. (On top of this he has no character at all.)

Omitting the first scene on Krypton, the film is rather subdued until the third act when the action gets cranked up to twelve. Phantom Drives get put over Metropolis, World Engines start terraforming for some reason and I’m pretty sure there was a Genesis Chamber somewhere in the mix. It’s actually incredible that they did the whole ‘Zod’s going to laser some random people’ moment because he had clearly already murdered countless extras. When the people start flying, nothing matters and nothing makes any sense and I lost interest.

The movie tries to reboot Superman in a gritty and Christopher Nolan way than it’s spandex predecessors. It definitely succeeds in that but leaves that viewer with a load and nonsensical shell of a movie. Any early enjoyment I found was negated by the disinteresting final third.

Recommendation Status: Not worth watching at all.


Please feel free to leave a comment on either the movie or the review. Say if you liked or disliked the movie. I'm interested to find out what you think!